Cline vs. Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice is
associated with an Oklahoma law that regulates a doctor's ability to prescribe
a treatment program that terminates early pregnancies. The so-called RU-486
pills are a safer and less-expensive alternative to surgical abortions. A
ruling supporting this law essentially keeps the "woman's right to choose"
premise alive, but makes the means of getting an abortion much, much more
difficult through "health and safety rules. The case examines an Oklahoma
law that regulates the use of the drug Mifeprex (the brand name of
mifepristone, also known as "the abortion pill"). However, those who
wrote the law openly declared that their real intent is to stop doctors from
actually using Mifeprex. And that’s the plan: leave a woman’s right to an
abortion alone, just make sure she can’t actually get one. The case examines an
Oklahoma law that regulates the use of the drug Mifeprex (the brand name of
mifepristone, also known as "the abortion pill"). However, those who
wrote the law openly declared that their real intent is to stop doctors from
actually using Mifeprex. And that’s the plan: leave a woman’s right to an
abortion alone, just make sure she can’t actually get one. The whole “regulate abortion out of
existence” approach dates back to 1992 when a 5-4 decision by the U.S. Supreme
Court upheld Roe while expanding the ability of states to use health
regulations to limit the practice. That created a loophole that the
anti-abortion lobby was quick to exploit, but it wasn’t a great loophole. It
only allowed regulation on the basis of “good medical practices,” meaning
opponents had to use science or peer-reviewed research. I feel abortions should be up to the person
getting the abortions they have to live with the out come what if they were
raped and they didn’t want the child from being rapped then they shouldn’t have
to. Too the ones who are getting pregnant
just cause they are being careless about it then they should only be able to
get it once or twice, three or four
times is to many..
NY TIMES